No.87 Jointed Coupling Rods and some other issues with Hornby Duke of Gloucester

I was my intention to finish with Duke of Gloucester (DoG) and to move on.  First however I would just fit some jointed coupling rods (from a Britannia).   It seems that nothing is quite that straight forward with my model and I uncovered some other issues hopefully will not bother too many of you, but just might be of interest to some of you.


Hornby R3191 Duke of Gloucester – a rare view in service

When first taken out of the box my model was a reluctant runner first crawling and then speeding up and then crawling again.  I thought that I had cured this behaviour when I removed the bottom plate and adjusted the pickups.  Well this weekend when trying to reverse the loco (on curved track) I was aware of a shower of sparks from beneath the driver’s side of the cab!  The picture below was taken when the engine first arrived but I have added the little red arrow to highlight a patch of bare metal – part of the gear mechanism which seems to protrude on one side more than the other.

Bare metal

Now that my engine has ‘run in’ (started to wear out) there is seemingly sufficient ‘play’ in the drive axle to allow the top of the wheel to come close to this area of bare metal resulting in the observed electrical shorting (sparks and slow running).

Insulating patch!

The quick fix was to cover the unpainted metal with some insulating tape.  There is a lot of lubricant at the location so perhaps not a permanent fix.  Plan B will probably be a coating of black paint.  (I had a similar problem with a Hornby Dublo 8F where I fitted larger diameter metal rimmed wheels to the pony truck only to find that the flanges would occasionally contact the metal chassis shorting out the controller and bringing the engine to an abrupt stop.)  In the longer term I guess I could dismantle the engine and grind off the protruding metal so that the bare face was recessed.

Current collectors

A second issue that I have noted relates to the means that Hornby have adopted to take the electrical current to the motor from the wipers on the wheels.  On two occasions I have reassembled the engine, put it on the track, only to find that it was completely ‘dead’.  On both occasions I had the wheel sets out and in order to do that I had removed the bottom plate.  There is a lot of lubricant around the axles on my model and all that I can think is that this was finding its way on to the contacts labelled A and B in the picture above.  Certainly cleaning these contacts before refitting the bottom plate brought the engine back to life.

Fluted or solid?

Other members of RMweb had suggested replacing the DoG one piece coupling rods with the jointed spares for Britannia.  That seemed an easy fix.  I would buy the necessary spare parts.  From the Hornby Service sheet for post 2008 loco driven Britannias the relevant Spare Part is  No. X9599.  However on arrival I noted that the Hornby spares are fluted rods not solid as on DoG (or on any of my loco driven Britannias).  There are plenty of pictures of DoG on Flickr, some from the 1960s and lots in preservation.  These confirm the rods should be solid.  Tracking down pictures of Britannias is also easy.  The official picture for 70000 shows the engine with fluted rods.  However subsequent ‘in service’ pictures from the 1960s and in preservation show solid rods – as fitted to the latest Hornby models.  Perhaps there are some other Hornby spares which I should have purchased?  However I like a challenge so the fluted rods were dismantled, reformed and fitted to show the solid side outermost.

Is there a difference in performance now that DoG is fitted with jointed rods?  Subjectively I would say it runs more smoothly – although my model still seems to find all the humps and bumps in my trackwork.  Quantitatively with the jointed rods fitted my Gaugemaster Controller had to be turned down a full notch to match the speed with the solid rods – so perhaps much less internal friction.  The same was true when coming to a stop using the Inertia Controller – with the jointed rods the engine ran on much longer - again suggesting much less internal friction.

For interest there are two HD videos on YouTube:

One with solid rods, and one with the newly fitted jointed rods.  I have to say perhaps not a great deal of difference – but it did fill in a rather wet Saturday.

The pictures above on the Hornby boxes are quite revealing.  DoG (top) is shown correctly with solid rods – but look at the dummy joint on the firebox section – that is not how my model was assembled.  The picture for ‘Oliver Cromwell’ (bottom) shows fluted rods which is incorrect as both prototype engine and model are fitted with solid rods.  How do Hornby manage to get these things wrong?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

No.123 Chocolate and Cream and BR1s – the Replica Railways Restaurant Buffet

Image
This Post describes some modifications that I have made to a Replica Railways BR Mk1 RB. Previously i have modified the Mainline Maroon RB by fitting Finecast glazing, wire handrails and Bachmann close coupling mechanisms. I promised myself that I would do the same for the chocolate and cream Replica BR(WR) RB. Success! Replica Railways BR(WR) Restaurant Buffet on BR1 Bogies First task - find a suitable coach! Replica Railways Mk1 RB from around 1992 Models are bit like London buses. When I first started looking for a BR(WR) RB there didn’t seem to be any around and eventually my coach came from Australia. Then suddenly there were lots available here in the UK. On opening the box I was surprised to discover that Replica had painted the solebars chocolate to match the lower body panels – why? Was someone confused by the blue solebars ion the blue and grey version? They should be black and they can be over painted with new transfers added from the P
Read more

No. 163 Hornby’s new A2/2 and A2/3

Image
Coming from the North East of England I couldn’t let these new Hornby models pass me by.    Thane of Fife had already disappeared from my 1960 ABC books and I never got to see Cock o’ the North.   There is a big red line through the number in my book, confirming its imminent withdrawal.   I did see the two A2/3s, Steady Aim being a York engine whilst around the beginning of the sixties Sun Castle was based at New England and then Doncaster. Thane of Fife after some adjustment to sand boxes and running plate Steady Aim after some adjustment to the speedometer bracket I hadn’t pre-ordered any of these Hornby models and was initially only interested in the two Late Crest engines.    The two Early Emblem engines were bought as an afterthought with some surprise earnings. All the models I have handled have run very well.   With some notable exceptions the models are also very impressive.   This Post summarises various issues (and fixes) that I have come across with these models.  
Read more

No. 166 A tale of two Hornby Super Detail ‘Britannias’, plus a Clan (Postscript)

Image
This Post brings a closure to my last two Posts.   Those of you who have read my accounts of rebadging a Hornby Clan and Britannia will know that there was some unfinished business.   Hornby ‘Britannia’ alias ‘Morning Star’ still needed cut outs around its lubricators.   Hornby ‘Clan McLeod’ alias ‘Clan Stewart’ needed its top lamp iron repositioning.  / A reminder, as received TMC Morning Star alias Hornby Britannia R2562 Completed – my 1959 version of 70021 Morning Star with solid rods, lubricator access, large dome, raised sand box covers, front step and rear cab supports Lubricator Cut Outs, one with (right) and R2562 without (left) In the same way that Hornby have engineered the Britannia body shell to cater for different numbers of raised sand box lids, the body moulding has also been set up to make it easy to alter from an engine without lubricator access (the early 1950s engines) to engines with an access hole in through the side of the footplate.   With a sharp bl
Read more