No.119 Mainline ex LMS 2P – worth a second look?
I recently took delivery of one of those cute little six wheeled vans originally from Ian Allan Publishing. I thought that an elderly Mainline ex LMS 2P would make a suitable train engine.
Ex LMS 4-4-0 in Dumfries Station in the early 1960s
I bought my Mainline 2P back in 1984 from C&G models in
Darlington.
Mainline 2P from 1984 – it has a lovely faded
appearance!
My model was supposed new but never ran properly and has
spent most of its 40 year life either in a box or resting peacefully in a
siding up against the buffers (stored).
Spot the 2P – engines waiting for their last journey at
Dumfries early 1960s
Although ‘branded’ as ‘Mainline’ my model is very obviously
of Airfix origins. The mechanics of the tender drive are identical to the unit
fitted to the Airfix 4F. The tender body is lined as opposed to plain black but
lacks the wire handrails that appeared later when the tender drive 4F was
reintroduced by Hornby. I had considered replacing my model with the latest
Hornby engine driven version. That was until I discovered that the latest model
still has rubber traction tyres – now on the engine driving wheels rather than
the tender! So still I think a wobbly engine?
The problem with my Mainline 2P was that whilst the engine
sailed along at ‘60mph’ the driving wheels were only rotating at say 20mph. I
removed the spring from the front bogie to see if this would transfer more
weight to driving wheels and encourage them to better rotate. There was no
noticeable improvement. Rotating the wheels by hand indicated a tight spot
symptomatic of the perennial problem with ready to run models where the wheels
are not properly quartered.
Driving wheels ready to be lifted clear
The LMS 2P has inside cylinders so there is no valve gear to
bother about. After unscrewing the bottom keeper plate the driving wheels can
be lifted straight out. The wheels on the Mainline model have 20 spokes which
means that the cranks on one side should be offset by five spokes on the other
side. On my model one wheel set had cranks offset nicely at 90 degrees. The
other wheel set could be seen to be not quite 90 degrees. Because of its Airfix
origins the plastic driving wheels are a push fit onto a shouldered knurled
axle. To change the relative position of the two wheels it is necessary to pull
one of the wheels completely off the axle. Only with the wheel clear of the
knurled end of the axle can it be rotated before being pushed back and
hopefully better orientated. I did this without removing the coupling rods.
I must have been lucky because after reassembly there was a
noticeable improvement. I have put together a wee video comparing the running
before and after re-quartering.
Engine to tender coupling shortened for Peco Medium
Radius Points
What else have I done to the engine? Well I have painted the
wheel rims black, shortened the engine to tender coupling and fitted a Bachmann
mini coupling to the tender. I am still thinking about the front bogie coupling
– the Mainline coupling is held in place with a brass rivet.
Mainline 2P left Bachmann Compound right
How does the 40 year old Mainline 2P compare with more
modern models?
Bachmann Compound left Mainline 2P right
I think the 2P body shell is quite well detailed with nice
lining and works plate. It does lack lamp irons and sprung buffers – all of
which can be updated relatively easily.
Mainline tender front Bachmann tender rear
A comparison of the Mainline and Bachmann tenders highlights
the age of the former model. As said earlier it is the original moulding for
the Airfix 4F from around 1975. However I think the lining is still reasonable
and I like the overall bleached look of the black plastic which reminds me of
the tired paintwork of the prototypes at the end of their working life in the
1960s.
Bachmann Compound showing front bogie spring
How does the performance of the models compare. Well before
any comparison is attempted it is worth removing the front bogie spring from
the Bachmann compound. The bogie is held on with a single screw into the metal
chassis block. Removing the spring makes a big difference to haulage capacity
on the gradients on my layout.
I have loaded another short video to YouTube showing both
the Mainline 2P and the Bachmann Compound in action. I would say the tender
drive on the 2P still has the edge over the engine drive of the compound. Not
bad for a 40 year old model. Why did it take me so long to sort out the
quartering?
Comments